TREC-SAVE: a trial for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN49454276 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49454276 |
| Protocol serial number | N/A |
| Sponsor | National Institute of Quality Control in Health (Brazil) |
| Funders | National Institute of Quality Control in Health - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Brazil), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (Brazil) - School of medicine |
- Submission date
- 14/12/2010
- Registration date
- 04/03/2011
- Last edited
- 28/07/2011
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Av Brasil 4365 Manguinhos
Rio de Janeiro
21040-900
Brazil
| gisele.huf@incqs.fiocruz.br |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Single-centre randomised open controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Randomised controlled trial comparing mechanical restraints with seclusion for aggressive mentally ill people in emergency psychiatric hospitals |
| Study acronym | TREC-SAVE |
| Study objectives | The trial aims to test the hypothesis that one procedure (seclusion or restraints) is more effective and/or more safe for the management of agitated and violent people in emergency psychiatric hospitals. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Ethics Committee from Philippe Pinel Institute in Rio de Janeiro approved on the 24th February 2010 (ref: 56/2010) |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Aggressive/violent mental illness |
| Intervention | 1. Use of four point physical restraint (cotton bands) and policy of close recording of mental state, behaviour, wellbeing, in addition to standard use of medication. 2. Use of secure seclusion room and policy of close recording of mental state, behaviour, wellbeing, in addition to standard use of medication. In the case of Instituto Philippe Pinel secure seclusion involves a locked room with minimal bedding but airy and with good day light though barred windows with no frame or glass open to the nursing station or passing patients. The total duration of each intervention is exactly the primary outcome, but follow-up in each arm will last by two weeks. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Time to release from restraints or seclusion |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Safe resolution of episode, measured 24 hours after the beginning of the episode |
| Completion date | 30/04/2011 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Other |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 100 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Anyone (no age or gender limits) thought to have a serious mental illness admitted to the hospital who has a degree or risk of aggression or violent behaviour that endangers themselves or others 2. Who is thought by medical and nursing staff to need some form of physical restriction 3. For whom the medical and nursing staff have doubt as to whether one form of restriction is better than the other |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Anyone for whom either or both packages of care are contraindicated by either medical or nursing staff 2. Anyone already randomised in this trial |
| Date of first enrolment | 16/06/2010 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/04/2011 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Brazil
Study participating centre
21040-900
Brazil
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol article | protocol | 20/07/2011 | Yes | No | |
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |