A Study of the clinical Utility, patient preference and cost benefit of Spect and PET-CT brain imaging in the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

ISRCTN ISRCTN49486383
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN49486383
Secondary identifying numbers 7622
Submission date
12/05/2010
Registration date
12/05/2010
Last edited
21/09/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mrs Nicola Barnett
Scientific

Institute for Ageing and Health
Newcastle University
Wolfson Research Centre
Campus for Ageing and Vitality
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE4 5PL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 248 1322
Email n.a.barnett@ncl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulticentre non-randomised diagnosis cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA multicentre cohort study of the clinical utility, patient preference and cost benefit of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) brain imaging in the evaluation and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease
Study acronymSuspected-AD
Study hypothesisThis study investigates which of two brain imaging techniques, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) brain imaging, is more accurate in the diagnosis of different types of dementia (specifically Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies). We will recruit 100 subjects of both sexes who are aged over 60 years (40 with Alzheimer's disease, 30 with dementia with Lewy bodies, and 30 similarly aged controls) who will then undergo blood flow SPECT and glucose (FDG) PET/CT scanning.

The diagnostic accuracy of each scanning method compared to expert clinical diagnosis using validated criteria will be assessed. Scans will be assessed in a way similar to that used clinically, meaning that findings will be directly applicable to the wider NHS setting. We will also use questionnaires and willingness to pay methods to determine whether one scan is preferred over another by patients and carers. This study will be important in determining which form of brain imaging is best to use for assessing people with dementia, an important question since PET is much more expensive than SPECT and may prove slightly less acceptable to patients. The study will be conducted over a 3-year period (2 years for patient recruitment, one year for scan and data analysis).

More details can be found here: http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/Search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=7622
Ethics approval(s)Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee, 29/01/2010, ref: 09/H0906/88
ConditionTopic: Dementias and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network; Subtopic: Dementia; Disease: Dementia
InterventionClinical assessment:
Motor features of parkinsonism will be assessed using the motor subsection of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III).

Cognitive assessment:
This will involve Cognitive testing with the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test) and executive function tests (verbal fluency and trails A & B). Standardised assessments of mood (Cornell scale for depression in dementia), neuropsychiatric features (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) and fluctuating attention will also be performed.

Imaging:
All participants will have a SPECT scan and a PET scan. Scans will be undertaken in a balanced order, so half of subjects will have the SPECT scan first followed by the PET, and half vice versa.

Preference questionnaires:
After each scan, patient and carer preference questionnaires will be administered. The carer would also be approached for a brief telephone interview 2 - 5 days after the scan.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureVisual Reporting of scans (PET and SPECT), measured at baseline
Secondary outcome measures1. Patient preference and cost, measured at end of recruitment phase
2. PET and SPECT maps compared for patients, measured at end of recruitment phase
3. Semi-automated region of interest analysis, measured at end of recruitment phase
4. Visual ratings of medial temporal lobe atrophy using the Scheltens scale, measured at end of recruitment phase
5. Visual ratings of scans on a semi-quantitative 4-point scale, measured at end of recruitment phase
6. Voxel based analysis using SPM5, measured at end of recruitment phase
Overall study start date01/04/2010
Overall study end date31/12/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned sample size: 100; UK sample size: 100
Participant inclusion criteria1. Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease or probable dementia with Lewy bodies or healthy age matched controls
2. Aged over 60 years, either sex
3. Dementia patients to have mild to moderate dementia severity (mini mental state examination [MMSE] greater than 12)
4. Sufficient English to complete cognitive and psychiatric ratings
Participant exclusion criteria1. Physical disability that would render the patient unable to undergo PET and SPECT scanning
2. Contraindications to PET or SPECT scanning
3. Unwillingness to undergo scanning
Recruitment start date01/04/2010
Recruitment end date31/12/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE4 5PL
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

St Nicholas Hospital
Jubilee Road
Gosforth
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE3 3XT
England
United Kingdom

Email Ali.Zaatar@ntw.nhs.uk
Website http://www.ntw.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ajv0n48

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) - Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 07/09/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

21/09/2017: Publication reference added.