Family focused cognitive behaviour therapy versus behaviourally oriented psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in 11 to 18 year olds: a randomised controlled treatment trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN59388875
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN59388875
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
08/03/2007
Registration date
22/05/2007
Last edited
03/05/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Trudie Chalder
Scientific

Department of Psychological Medicine
King's College London
Weston Education Centre
Cutcombe Road
London
SE5 9RJ
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designA randomised controlled trial in which 13 sessions of family focused CBT was compared to 4 sessions of psycho-education over six months.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesCognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) will result in higher levels of school return than psycho-education at six months follow up.
Ethics approval(s)King's College London Hospital (UK) on the 14/09/1999 (ref: 99/247)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) otherwise known as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)
Intervention13 sessions of family focused CBT versus four sessions of psycho-education over six months.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureSchool attendance expressed as a percentage of what was expected.
Secondary outcome measuresAs a secondary outcome school attendance was dichotomised with a good outcome set at 70% or more, as at this age many healthy adolescents are not attending school or college full time. The following were recorded at six months:
1. Fatigue: Chalder Fatigue Scale - internal consistency in this sample was excellent with a Chronbach’s alpha of 0.89
2. Functional impairment: physical functioning subscale of the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) (range 0 to 100 higher scores denoting better health) - this measure is valid and reliable and has been used in adolescents with CFS
3. Degree to which fatigue interfered with adolescent’s life: Social Adjustment Scale - Chronbach’s alpha was 0.91
4. Emotional and social responses: adolescents and their mothers completed the strengths and difficulties questionnaire - this measure has been shown to be valid and reliable in a number of studies
5. Global improvement and satisfaction: Global Outcome Scales - an assessor, blind to the group in which participants were randomised, carried out a semi-structured interview with the adolescent and rated degree of improvement in fatigue and disability on a nine-point scale from “much better” to “much worse”
Overall study start date01/02/2000
Completion date30/06/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit11 Years
Upper age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants58 participants
Key inclusion criteria1. Adolescents between 11and 18
2. Fulfill criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome
3. Have been investigated by a Paediatrician
4. If on anti-depressants, then had to be on a stable dose for three months
Key exclusion criteria1. Major depression
2. Somatisation disorder
3. Conversion disorder
4. History of self harm
5. Identifiable disease
Date of first enrolment01/02/2000
Date of final enrolment30/06/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Psychological Medicine
London
SE5 9RJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

South London & Maudsley NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Denmark Hill
London
SE5 8AZ
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.slam.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/015803449

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive London Region Office (UK) (ref: RFG 640)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/08/2010 Yes No