The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study: a randomized controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multi-vessel coronary artery disease

ISRCTN ISRCTN66068876
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN66068876
Secondary identifying numbers 946/94/056
Submission date
06/02/2006
Registration date
27/07/2006
Last edited
29/09/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Prof Whady Hueb
Scientific

44 Dr. Eneas Carvalho Aguiar avenue
AB sala 114
Sao Paulo
05403-000
Brazil

Study information

Study designRandomized controlled comparative study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleThe medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study: a randomized controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multi-vessel coronary artery disease
Study acronymMASS II
Study hypothesisTo evaluate the relative efficacies of the possible therapeutic strategies for patients with multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), stable angina, and preserved ventricular function.
Ethics approval(s)Institutional Review Board (IRB), Brazil, 08/08/1994
ConditionCoronary Artery Disease (CAD)
InterventionIn this trial, all patients were placed on an optimal medical regiment consisting of a stepped-care approach using nitrates, aspirin, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or a combination of these drugs, unless contraindicated. 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl Glutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors were also prescribed along with a low-fat diet on an individual basis. The medications were provided free by the Heart Institute.

Patients were then randomized into three groups to continue with aggressive medical therapy alone or to undergo PCI or CABG concurrent with the medical treatment.

Trial operators were required to do optimum coronary revascularization in accordance with current best practice. Equivalent revascularization was encouraged but was not mandatory.

For patients assigned to have PCI, the procedure was available within three weeks after the assignment. Devices used for catheter-based therapeutic strategies, including stents, lasers, directional atherectomy and balloon angioplasty, were available to the interventionist. Angioplasty was performed according to a standard protocol. Successful revascularization in the PCI group was defined as a residual stenosis of less than 50% reduction in luminal diameter with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade flow three.

Patients assigned to the CABG group underwent the operation within 12 weeks after assignment. Complete revascularization was accomplished if technically feasible with saphenous vein grafts, internal mammary arteries and other conduits such as radial or gastroepiploic arteries. Standard surgical techniques were used under hypothermic arrest with blood cardioplegia. No off-pump CABG was performed.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Nitrates, aspirin, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and 3-Hydroxy-3-Methyl Glutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors
Primary outcome measure1. Non-fatal myocardial infarction
2. Cardiac death
3. Refractory angina requiring revascularization
Secondary outcome measures1. Quality of life
2. Cost comparison
3. Cerebro-Vascular Accident (CVA)
Overall study start date10/06/1994
Overall study end date31/12/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants611
Total final enrolment611
Participant inclusion criteria1. Stable angina
2. Preserved left ventricular function
3. Two or three vessel disease
Participant exclusion criteria1. Unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction requiring emergency revascularization
2. Ventricular aneurism requiring surgical repair
3. Left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%
4. A history of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) and single vessel disease
5. A history of congenital heart disease
6. Valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy
7. Inability to understand or cooperate with the protocol requirements or return for follow-up
8. Left main coronary artery stenosis of 50% or more
9. Suspected or known pregnancy
10. Other coexisting condition that was a contraindication to CABG or PCI
Recruitment start date10/06/1994
Recruitment end date31/12/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Brazil

Study participating centre

44 Dr. Eneas Carvalho Aguiar avenue
Sao Paulo
05403-000
Brazil

Sponsor information

Zerbini Foundation (Brazil)
Charity

Fundação Zerbini
Clinical Research Office
Av. Brig. Faria Lima
1.884 - 2º Andar
Sao Paulo
01451-000
Brazil

Website http://www.zerbini.org.br
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/003c2h870

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Zerbini Foundation (Brazil)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 09/09/2003 Yes No
Results article results 19/05/2004 Yes No
Results article results 06/03/2007 Yes No
Results article results on the association of chronic kidney dysfunction in patients with multivessel chronic coronary artery disease 01/06/2009 Yes No
Results article results on the association of TCF7L2 polymorphism rs7903146 and coronary artery disease severity and mortality 17/11/2009 Yes No
Results article results 07/09/2010 Yes No
Results article results 14/09/2010 Yes No
Results article results 20/01/2011 Yes No
Other publications cost analysis 11/09/2012 Yes No
Results article results 11/09/2012 Yes No
Results article results 01/08/2013 Yes No
Results article 10-year follow-up results 01/11/2013 Yes No
Results article 10-year results 01/11/2013 Yes No
Results article cost-effectiveness results 03/11/2018 Yes No
Results article -year follow-up results 01/08/2020 16/12/2020 Yes No
Results article 22/09/2022 29/09/2022 Yes No

Editorial Notes

29/09/2022: Publication reference added.
16/12/2020: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
12/11/2018: Publication reference added.