ISRCTN ISRCTN69423238
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN69423238
EudraCT/CTIS number 2010-019469-26
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 08/71/01
Submission date
14/04/2010
Registration date
18/11/2010
Last edited
06/08/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
A kidney stone is a piece of solid material that forms in the kidney when minerals in the urine become very concentrated. If stones grow to sufficient size they can cause blockage of the ureter (the tube that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder) and can be very painful. They are a common cause of emergency hospital admission due to severe pain and requirement for pain relief, time off work and often repeated hospital admissions for treatment. Drugs that cause relaxation of the ureter can enhance the spontaneous passage of ureteric stones. The drugs Tamsulosin and Nifedipine can improve the passage of ureteric stones and the process is termed medical expulsive therapy (MET). This avoids the need for further treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of Tamsulosin and Nifedipine in the management of ureteric stones.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18-65 with a confirmed ureteric stone.

What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to be treated with either Nifedipine, Tamsulosin or placebo (dummy) tablets. Participants will take one capsule orally per day for a maximum of 28 days and will be followed up by postal questionnaires sent from the trial office at 4 and 12 weeks after random allocation. In addition patients may be reviewed in clinic at 4 weeks after random allocation.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The potential benefits to participants are that the pain and discomfort caused by their ureteric stone will be relieved sooner and they may avoid additional treatment. There may be no personal benefit from taking part in the study as there is no guarantee that the MET therapy will be successful, but participants will be offered other treatments if symptoms get worse or do not improve. By taking part in the study participants will be directly helping in the treatment of future patients diagnosed with ureteric stones. The results of the study will help plan effective services offered by the NHS. Some patients may report side effects to the study medications but these are usually mild and disappear after a short while. The medications used are not new drugs and have been used in routine use for many years for other health problems.

Where is the study run from?
The study will be conducted in secondary care units across the UK. Co-ordination of the study will occur at the Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT) in the Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
From January 2011 to October 2013.

Who is funding the study?
The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme.

Who is the main contact?
Professor Sam McClinton
smclinton@nhs.net
SUSPEND trial office
suspend@abdn.ac.uk

Study website

Contact information

Dr Samuel McClinton
Scientific

NHS Grampian
Department of Urology
Ward 44
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZB
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1224 550517
Email smcclinton@nhs.net

Study information

Study designMulticentre double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Patient information sheet may be downloaded from http://www.charttrials.abdn.ac.uk/suspend
Scientific titleUse of drug therapy in the management of symptomatic ureteric stones in hospitalised adults: a multicentre placebo controlled randomised trial of a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) and an α blocker (tamsulosin)
Study acronymSUSPEND
Study hypothesisWhat is the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the use of an α blocker (tamsulosin) and a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) in the management of symptomatic urinary stones.

More details can be found at http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/087101
Protocol can be found at http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/53064/PRO-08-71-01.pdf

On 20/03/2013 the following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 30/11/2012 to 31/10/2013.
2. The target number of participants was changed from 2000 to 1200.

On 09/04/2013 the overall trial end date was changed from 31/10/2013 to 01/03/2014.
Ethics approval(s)The Fife and Forth Valley Research Ethics Committee, 04/08/2010, ref: 10/S0501/31
ConditionSymptomatic Ureteric Stones
InterventionParticipants will be randomised to one of the following treatment groups.
1. The calcium channel blocker nifedipine, 30 mg once per day
2. The α-blocker tamsulosin, 0.4 mg once per day
3. Placebo once per day

Participants will take one capsule orally per day for a maximum of 28 days and will be followed-up by postal questionnaires sent from the trial office at four and 12 weeks after randomisation.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Nifedipine, tamsulosin
Primary outcome measure1. Spontaneous passage of ureteric stones at four weeks (defined as no further intervention required to facilitate stone passage)
2. Incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained at 12 weeks. QALYs are based on the responses to the EQ-5D.
Secondary outcome measures1. Patient-reported outcomes, at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks:
1.1. Severity of pain as measured by Verbal descriptor scale (VDS) and Numeric Rating scale (NRS)
1.2. Generic health profile as measured by the SF 36 and use of analgesia
2. Clinical outcomes:
2.1. Time to passage of stone
2.2. Further interventions received at 12 weeks
3. Safety: Patient reported discontinuation of trial medications
4. Cost effectiveness:
4.1. NHS primary and secondary care use and costs up to three months, incremental cost per surgical interventions averted
4.2. Modelled incremental cost per QALY beyond the 12 week trial follow-up
Overall study start date01/09/2010
Overall study end date01/03/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1200
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients presenting acutely with ureteric colic
2. Adults ≥18 ≤ 65 years of age
3. Presence of stone confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidney, ureter and bladder (CTKUB), or by intravenous urogram (IVU) with subsequent CTKUB confirmation within 12 hours
4. Stone within any segment of the ureter
5. Unilateral ureteric stone
6. Largest stone dimension ≤10 mm
7. Female subjects must be post menopausal (defined as 12 months with no menses without an alternative medical cause), permanently sterilised or willing to use two methods of contraception listed in the protocol prior to the start of dosing until at least 28 days after receiving the last dose of trial medication
8. Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form
Participant exclusion criteria1. Women who have a known or suspected pregnancy
2. Women who are breastfeeding
3. Asymptomatic incidentally found ureteric stone
4. Stone not confirmed by CTKUB
5. Stone with any one dimension >10 mm
6. Kidney stone without the presence of ureteric stone
7. Multiple (i.e. ≥ 2) stones within ureter
8. Bilateral ureteric stones
9. Stone in a ureter draining a solitary kidney (either anatomically or functionally)
10. Patients with abnormal renal tract anatomy (such as a duplex system, horseshoe kidney or ileal conduit)
11. Presence of urinary sepsis
12. Chronic renal failure (estinated Glomerular Filtration Rate [eGFR] < 30ml/min)
13. Patients currently taking an α blocker
14. Patients currently taking a calcium channel blocker
15. Patients currently taking PDE5 inhibitors
16. Contraindication or allergy to tamsulosin or nifedipine
17. Patients who are unable to understand or complete trial documentation
Recruitment start date01/01/2011
Recruitment end date31/10/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

NHS Grampian
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Aberdeen (UK)
University/education

Research and Innovation
Kings College
Regent Walk
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Scotland
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1224 272123
Email res-innov@abdn.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/016476m91

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 20/06/2014 Yes No
Results article substudy results 08/07/2015 Yes No
Results article results 25/07/2015 Yes No
Results article results 01/08/2015 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No