Participatory ergonomics for mental health disorders, a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness evaluation

ISRCTN ISRCTN92307123
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN92307123
Protocol serial number NTR473
Sponsor TNO Quality of Life (Work & Employment) (Netherlands)
Funder Expert Reintegration Studies Centre (STECR) (Netherlands)
Submission date
27/01/2006
Registration date
27/01/2006
Last edited
23/05/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Han J.R. Anema
Scientific

VU University Medical Center
Department of Public and Occupational Health and EMGO-Institute
Body@Work TNO
van der Boechorststraat 7
Amsterdam
1081 BT
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)20 4446495/(0)6 13186986
Email h.anema@vumc.nl

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised open label active controlled parallel group trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesIs participatory ergonomics for workers with common mental disorders more (cost-)effective on return-to-work than usual clinical medical care?
Ethics approval(s)Added as of 23/08/2007: The Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) has approved the study protocol.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMental disorders
InterventionA project group consisting of experts in the field of mental disorders will develop a protocol for workplace adaptations based on methods used in participatory ergonomics (PE).
Work(place) adaptations, will be applied by a trained occupational nurse. A group of stakeholders (sick listed worker, the worker's supervisor, and potential other stakeholders) in the return-to-work (RTW) process will be formed and guided by the occupational nurse. The protocol is directed to achieve consensus among stakeholders regarding feasible work(place) adaptations to facilitate RTW.
Patients will be randomised to PE or usual clinical care (n = 2 x 72). A process analysis will be included.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Sickleave duration until full return-to-work

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Psychological complaints
2. Functional status
3. Coping
4. Direct and indirect costs

Completion date15/09/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration160
Key inclusion criteria1. Sicklisted due to distress problems due to overwork (completely or partially)
2. Between 18 and 65 years of age
Key exclusion criteria1. Duration of sick leave longer than 3 months
2. Juridical conflict at work
3. No ability to complete questionnaires written in the Dutch language
Date of first enrolment15/09/2005
Date of final enrolment15/09/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam
1081 BT
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2010 Yes No
Results article results 01/09/2010 Yes No
Protocol article protocol 14/01/2008 Yes No