Randomised controlled trial of contrast-enhanced colonoscopy in the reduction of right-sided bowel cancer
ISRCTN | ISRCTN98539180 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN98539180 |
IRAS number | 271876 |
Secondary identifying numbers | SPON 1781-19, CPMS 44738, IRAS 271876 |
- Submission date
- 21/01/2020
- Registration date
- 19/02/2020
- Last edited
- 23/02/2024
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
The UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme has reduced the risk of death from bowel cancer by 15%. People testing positive on a bowel cancer screening stool test are offered colonoscopy (bowel camera examination) through the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. About half of those have cancers or polyps (small abnormal growths that might lead to cancer in the future) found on colonoscopy. There is some evidence to suggest that these cancers could be caused by a certain type of flat polyp called a serrated polyp which can be difficult to detect during standard colonoscopy. Small studies have suggested that these polyps and may grow into cancer faster than the usual polyps and up to 1 in 5 bowel cancers may actually have developed from these subtle serrated polyps. Moreover, deaths from cancer of the upper bowel are not reducing.
This study will investigate if spraying a blue dye in the upper large bowel helps the doctor to detect more flat polyps during the colonoscopy. At the moment it is not known if spraying the dye in the upper large bowel is the best way to improve detection so participants who are due to have a screening colonoscopy will be randomly assigned into two groups; one to have a standard colonoscopy and the other to have a colonoscopy using the dye spray. This will allow a comparison of what happens between the two groups. The aim is to find out through this study if this method works in practice and improves the detection and removal of more serrated polyps within the screening programme.
Who can participate?
All participants in the UK bowel screening programmes (Wales, England, Scotland) who test positive on the FIT test (bowel cancer screening stool test) and are eligible for an index screening colonoscopy. Participants will only be ineligible for the study if they have received previous resectional colorectal surgery (as this would influence both study methods and outcomes depending on the length of residual colon in the individual), and/or have a known allergy to food colouring agent (as the Indigo Carmine dye is a safe food colouring agent but extremely rarely there may be individuals with a specific allergic response to this in the past).
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated into two groups; one to have a standard colonoscopy and the other to have a colonoscopy using the dye spray. They are followed up through routinely collected data systems.
A subset of participants may take part in the FORE AI substudy (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15467766).
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
By participating in bowel screening, all participants will already have taken steps to detect polyps and consequently reduce their risk for future bowel cancer. If allocated to the dye spray group, more polyps may be detected and removed that could have turned into cancer, which further minimises the risk of future bowel cancer. However, the colonoscopy with dye spray will take on average 6 minutes longer than usual, especially if extra polyps are found, and there may be an increased risk of complications (e.g. bleeding if polyps found are removed) although we believe this to be very unlikely. Additionally, there is the chance that the extra polyps remove may never have turned into cancer.
For all participants, the main benefits of the study will be to inform UK bowel cancer screening programmes in the future as to whether the using dye spray during colonoscopies helps in the detection of serrated polyps and possibly prevention of bowel cancers.
The blue dye used within the interventional arm is a safe food colouring agent and is already used routinely in various endoscopy procedures in standard clinical practice. Extremely rarely there may be individuals with a specific allergic response to this in the past. For this reason, anyone with a known allergy to a food colouring agent will be excluded from taking part in the study.
Where is the study run from?
The trial team are based in the Centre for Trials Research (CTR) at Cardiff University. Overall, the researchers plan that 25 centres in total across Wales, England and Scotland will participate in the recruitment for the trial. The lead centre will be Llandough Hospital (Cardiff & Vale University Health Board) as this is the site that the Chief Investigator, Dr Sunil Dolwani, is based at.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2019 to December 2025
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Georgina Gardner
CONSCOP2@cardiff.ac.uk
Contact information
Public
Centre for Trials Research
College of Biomedical & Life Sciences
Cardiff University
6th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd
Heath Park
Cardiff
CF14 4YS
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)2920 687 950 |
---|---|
CONSCOP2@cardiff.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Multicentre open-label individually randomised (1:1) controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Screening |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet |
Scientific title | Randomised controlled trial of contrast-enhanced colonoscopy in the reduction of right-sided bowel cancer (the CONSCOP 2 study) |
Study acronym | CONSCOP 2 |
Study hypothesis | Primary hypothesis: 1. Proximal advanced serrated lesion (SL) detection rates will be greater when spraying blue indigo carmine dye throughout the upper large bowel during colonoscopy (chromocolonoscopy) when compared to a standard colonoscopy without dye Secondary hypotheses: 1. Other lesion detection rates (e.g. advanced neoplasia, serrated lesions, advanced adenomas) will be greater using chromocolonoscopy when compared to standard colonoscopy 2. Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) thresholds will impact on the SL detection rates in each arm of the study Secondary objectives: 1. Evaluate the longer-term economic impact of chromocolonoscopy within the screening setting 2. Model and compare the post-colonoscopy interval advanced polyp and cancer detection and death rates for the two arms 3. Assess the association between demographic and lifestyle factors and SLs at index colonoscopy 4. Assess the association between demographic and lifestyle factors and SLs at surveillance colonoscopies in order to inform the stratification and optimisation of surveillance frequency A subset of participants may take part in the FORE AI substudy (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15467766). |
Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 26/02/2020, Wales REC 6 (Health and Care Research Wales Support and Delivery Centre, Castlebridge 4, 15-19 Cowbridge Road East, Cardiff, CF11 9AB, United Kingdom; +44 (0)1874 615949; Wales.REC6@wales.nhs.uk), ref: 20/WA/0019 |
Condition | Bowel cancer |
Intervention | A randomised open controlled trial (RCT) of chromocolonoscopy (spraying blue indigo carmine dye throughout the upper large bowel during colonoscopy) vs a standard colonoscopy without dye in index bowel cancer screening to reduce bowel cancer mortality. CONSCOP2 will recruit 2652 participants from ~20 centres in England, Wales and Scotland attending index colonoscopies within the bowel screening programme and will follow them up through routinely collected data systems. The data obtained in this study will establish whether or not chromocolonoscopy should be used instead of standard white light for index colonoscopies within the UK bowel cancer screening programmes. A subset of participants may take part in the FORE AI substudy (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15467766). |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Detection of any proximal advanced serrated lesions as defined by pathological assessment at index colonoscopy (colonoscopy intervention) |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Pathological types and counts of all polyps detected at index procedure (colonoscopy intervention) 2. Pathological types and counts of all polyps detected at surveillance procedure (up to 1 year after repeat procedures). Types of all polyps detected at surveillance procedures will be obtained from local histopathology reports and routinely collected screening datasets 3. Cancers and deaths obtained from routinely collected health datasets (follow up for 3 years) |
Overall study start date | 18/06/2019 |
Overall study end date | 01/12/2025 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 2652 |
Total final enrolment | 2750 |
Participant inclusion criteria | All FIT-positive people in the participating centres, eligible for index screening colonoscopy using high definition scopes |
Participant exclusion criteria | 1. Previous resectional colorectal surgery (as this would influence both study methods and outcomes depending on the length of residual colon in the individual) 2. Known allergy to food colouring agent (as the Indigo Carmine dye is a safe food colouring agent but extremely rarely there may be individuals with a specific allergic response to this in the past) |
Recruitment start date | 23/07/2021 |
Recruitment end date | 09/02/2024 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- Scotland
- United Kingdom
- Wales
Study participating centres
Penrhosgarnedd
Bangor Gwynedd
Bangor
LL57 2PW
United Kingdom
Hafan Derwen
St Davids Park, Jobswell Road
Carmarthen
SA31 3BB
United Kingdom
Heath Park
Cardiff
CF14 4XW
United Kingdom
Dewi Sant Hospital
Albert Road
Pontypridd
CF37 1LB
United Kingdom
Holdforth Road
Hartlepool
TS24 9AH
United Kingdom
Headley Way
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Infirmary Square
Leicester
LE1 5WW
United Kingdom
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom
Kettering
NN16 8UZ
United Kingdom
Dudley
DY1 2HQ
United Kingdom
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Cheltenham
GL53 7AN
United Kingdom
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Mansfield Road
Sutton-in-ashfield
NG17 4JL
United Kingdom
Derby
DE22 3NE
United Kingdom
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Dryburn Hospital
North Road
Durham
DH1 5TW
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Research Governance Coordinator Research and Innovation Services Cardiff University
7th Floor, McKenzie House
30-36 Newport Rd
Cardiff
CF24 0DE
Wales
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)29208 79130 |
---|---|
ShawC3@cardiff.ac.uk | |
Website | http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/ |
https://ror.org/03kk7td41 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 01/09/2025 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | Data from all sites will be analysed together and published as soon as possible. Individual participating PIs may not publish data concerning their participants that are directly relevant to questions posed by the trial until the TMG has published its report. The TMG will form the basis of the writing committee and advise on the nature of publications, subject to the Sponsor’s requirements. Publication will be according to the publication policy of the CTR and the CONSCOP2 publication plan. Principles regarding authorship and writing: 1. All proposals for publications using CONSCOP2 data must be approved by the TMG 2. A lead author and wider writing team will be established for each identified paper 3. All potential contributors will have the opportunity to opt into a writing team 4. It is the responsibility of the Chief Investigator (CI) and Study Lead to ensure balance and inclusivity in writing teams across the range of likely study publications, to ensure everyone is appropriately acknowledged and has the opportunity to be involved as an author 5. It is the responsibility of the CI to decide authorship order, usually in discussion with the lead author and Study Lead 6. All named authors must meet authorship criteria (e.g. see http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorshipauthorship)) 7. Submission of abstracts for conference presentation should be agreed in advance with the TMG. Authors should allow sufficient time for their request to be reviewed. This may be completed via email. However, if there is insufficient time for the TMG to review such a request, the CI can make a decision on behalf of the TMG. The body of the presentation (including posters) should be reviewed by the TMG prior to presentation. This may be completed via email |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available on request upon consideration by the TSC and TMG. When enrolling for the trial, participants will provide their permission for the Sponsor (Cardiff University) to access their medical records through routinely collected cancer registries and national screening programmes. This will be used to follow up the health status of all participants. Participants will not be identified in any report, publication or presentation; all results will be completely anonymous. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol file | version 4 | 17/11/2020 | 17/01/2023 | No | No |
HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
23/02/2024: Links to substudy registration were added.
22/02/2024: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. A substudy (FORE AI) was mentioned in the study hypothesis, interventions, and plain English summary (this is registered separately [https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15467766])
2. The total final enrolment was added.
3. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/05/2020 to 23/07/2021.
4. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/01/2023 to 09/02/2024.
5. The study participating centres Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University LHB, Aneurin Bevan University LHB, NHS Tayside, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Powys Teaching LHB, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Nhs Greater Glasgow and Clyde, St George's University Hospital, County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust were removed and John Radcliffe Hospital, Kettering General Hospital, Russells Hall Hospital, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Cheltenham General Hospital, Nottingham University Hospital, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University Hospital of North Durham were added.
17/01/2023: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
13/12/2021: The recruitment end date was changed from 01/09/2022 to 31/01/2023.
28/07/2020: The ethics approval was added.
17/02/2020: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.