A pilot study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy for people in acute psychiatric wards.

ISRCTN ISRCTN17890126
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17890126
Secondary identifying numbers 15409
Submission date
22/04/2015
Registration date
22/04/2015
Last edited
17/05/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Suicide is a major cause of preventable death with patients in acute psychiatric wards being oat particularly high risk. Many patients experience repeated episodes of suicidal behaviour causing great mental distress and heavy use of NHS services. However there is little research investigating treatments that work in helping patients address issues that lead to suicide. This study investigates issues concerning the introduction of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for suicide prevention for patients in acute psychiatric wards who are a very high risk group in a setting where use of psychological therapies is uncommon and requires evaluation.

Who can participate?
Adult (aged between18-65) inpatients on an acute psychiatric ward.

What does the study involve?
Researchers first observe ward life and investigate “usual patient journeys” to identify best ways of introducing the new therapy. Participants are then randomly allocated into one of two groups. Those in group 1 receive their usual treatment. Those in group 2 receive their usual treatment and cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy (CBSP). Ward staff and patients are asked about their views before and after introduction of the new therapy. Participants also complete questionnaires to identify how they feel (mood, suicidal ideas, functioning and general wellbeing). These assessments are made before treatment begins, after 6 weeks and then after 6 months. Staff and patients are interviewed to give their views of the new therapy, how it fits into ward routines, whether they like the therapy and if they feel any benefits or otherwise. We also identify costs of NHS treatment for both groups and make comparisons.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
May 2014 to December 2015

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Ms Sarah Jones.

Contact information

Ms Sarah Jones
Scientific

Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust
Rawnsley Building
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleA pilot study to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy for people in acute psychiatric wards: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymINSITE Phase 2
Study hypothesisThis feasibility study investigates issues concerning the introduction of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for suicide prevention for patients in acute psychiatric wards who are a very high risk group in a setting where use of psychological therapies is uncommon and requires evaluation.
Ethics approval(s)First MREC approval date 21/08/2013, ref: 13/NW/0504MHRNB;
ConditionTopic: Mental Health; Subtopic: Suicide and self-harm; Disease: Suicide and self harm
InterventionPilot study to investigate the feasibility of cognitive behavioural suicide prevention therapy (CBSP). Participants will be randomly allocated to two treatment arms - treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus CBSP Intervention.
Follow Up Length: 5 month(s); Study Entry : Single Randomisation only
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe Suicidal Behaviours Questionnaire – revised (SBQ-R); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
Secondary outcome measures1. Basic Emotions Scale (BES; Power, 2006); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
2. Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS; Beck & Steer, 1991); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up and 6 month follow up
3. Calgary Depression Scale (Addington et al, 1990); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
4. Coping in Stressful Situations (Endler & Parker, 1990); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
5. EG-5D (Euroqol Group, 1990); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
6. Personal and Social Performance Scale (Morosoni et al 2000); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
7. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; Kay, Opler & Fiszbein, 1987); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
8. Psychotic Symptoms Rating Scale (Haddock et al, 1999); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
9. Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI; Espie et al, 2013); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
10. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS; Beck, 1988); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
11. The Defeat Scale (Gilbert & Allan, 1998); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
12. The Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2004); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
13. The Entrapment Scale (Gilbert & Allan, 1998); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
14. The Forms of Self Criticising/Attacking & Self Reassuring Scale; Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
15. The Implicit Beliefs About Emotions Scale ( IBES; Tamir et al 2004); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
16. The Self Concept Questionnaire (Robson, 1989); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
17. The Suicide Probability Scale (SPS; Cull & Gill 1988); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
18. The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment , brief version (WHOQOL-BREF; Skevington, L; Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week follow up, 6 month follow up
19. Views on Inpatient Care (VOICE; Evans et al, 2012); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week/6 month follow up (dependent on hospital admission dates
20. Views on Therapeutic Environments (VOTE; Laker et al, 2012); Timepoint(s): Baseline, 6 week/6 month follow up (depending on hospital admission dates)
21. Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath, 1992); Timepoint(s): Taken at 2 time points during course of therapy
Overall study start date01/05/2014
Overall study end date31/12/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit65 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 60; UK Sample Size: 60; Description: Study team advised new sample size is 60 - 30 in interventional group and 30 in treatment as usual group 19/11/13
Total final enrolment51
Participant inclusion criteria1. Inpatients on an acute psychiatric ward
2. Adults aged 18-65 years
3. Mental capacity to provide informed consent
4. Positive risk of suicide verified SBQ-R
Participant exclusion criteriaPlanned discharge within next 7 days.
Recruitment start date01/05/2014
Recruitment end date31/12/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust
Rawnsley Building
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Rawnsley Building
Manchester Royal Infirmary
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
England
United Kingdom

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health Research
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 11/02/2016 Yes No
Other publications qualitative results 16/10/2018 Yes No
Results article 01/01/2019 17/05/2023 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

17/05/2023: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
18/10/2018: Publication reference added.
15/02/2016: Publication reference added.