Comparative efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole against hookworm infection in Laos

ISRCTN ISRCTN29126001
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN29126001
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
25/04/2008
Registration date
09/10/2008
Last edited
02/05/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Peter Odermatt
Scientific

Swiss Tropical Institute
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology
Socinstrasse 57
Basel
4002
Switzerland

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleComparative efficacy of Albendazole and Mebendazole against hookworm infection: Randomised, controlled trial in schoolchildren in Khamkeuth district, Bolikhamxay province, Laos
Study acronymAlMebLaos
Study objectivesAlbendazole (400 mg single dose) is more effective than mebendazole (500 mg single dose) in clearing hookworm infection.
Ethics approval(s)National Ethics Committee for Health Research, Vientiane, Laos. Date of approval: 01/04/2008 (ref: 170 /NECHR)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHookworm infection, and other intestinal helminth infections
InterventionMebendazole (500 mg, single dose, oral) vs albendzole (400 mg, single dose, oral) treatment.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Albendazole and mebendazole
Primary outcome measureHookworm parasite clearance (no hookworm egg in four Kato-Katz slides taken on two stool samples) at 21-23 days after treatment
Secondary outcome measuresReduction of intensity of infection (reduction of mean number of hookworm eggs counted on four Kato-Katz slides taken on two different stool samples) at 21-23 days after treatment
Overall study start date28/04/2008
Completion date30/05/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit6 Years
Upper age limit16 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants190
Key inclusion criteria1. School-child age between 6 and 16 years, both male and female
2. Hookworm infected (at least one of four egg-positive Kato-Katz slide, established on 2 stool samples)
Key exclusion criteria1. Pregnancy
2. Severe illness
3. Non-consent
Date of first enrolment28/04/2008
Date of final enrolment30/05/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Swiss Tropical Institute
Basel
4002
Switzerland

Sponsor information

Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland)
Government

Wildhainweg 3
P.O. Box 8232
Bern
3001
Switzerland

Website http://www.snf.ch
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00yjd3n13

Funders

Funder type

Government

Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland)
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds, Swiss National Science Foundation, Fonds National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique, Fondo Nazionale Svizzero per la Ricerca Scientifica, Fonds National Suisse, Fondo Nazionale Svizzero, Schweizerische Nationalfonds, SNF, SNSF, FNS
Location
Switzerland

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2012 Yes No