The influence of clasp design on twin block appliances outcome - a prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN45965219
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN45965219
Secondary identifying numbers N0188119744
Submission date
12/09/2003
Registration date
12/09/2003
Last edited
15/05/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr MJ Trenouth
Scientific

Consultant Orthodontist
Royal Preston Hospital
Sharoe Green Lane North
Fulwood
Preston
PR2 9HT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1772 523150
Email michaeltrenouth@hotmail.co.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeNot Specified
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet.
Scientific title
Study hypothesisTo discover if incorporating a Southend Clasp on the upper central incisors in the design of the Twin Block Appliance will eliminate or greatly reduce incisor retraction thereby enhancing mandibular advancement.
Ethics approval(s)Added May 2008: Preston and Chorley and South Ribble Research Ethics Committee on 03/07/2003
ConditionOral Health: Orthodontics
InterventionRandom allocation of two alternative designs of twin block appliance, one with a Southend clasp on the upper central incisors and one without. The appliances are identical in all other aspects.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAdded May 2008:
Angulation of the long axis of the upper incisor to the maxillary plane, as measured from a lateral cephalometric radiograph.
Secondary outcome measuresAdded May 2008:
1. Angulation of the long axis of the lower incisor to the mandibular plane
2. Skeletal relationship as measured by angle ANB
Overall study start date01/01/2003
Overall study end date01/04/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit11 Years
Upper age limit15 Years
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants102. Corrected May 2008: 52. Added October 2009: recruitment completed and analysis ongoing.
Participant inclusion criteria1. Patients aged 11-15 years
2. Added May 2008: with Class II division 1 malocclusion suitable for functional appliance therapy. The overjet had to be greater than 6mm and ANB angle greater than 4°.
Participant exclusion criteriaAdded May 2008:
Patients with congenital syndromes, obvious asymmetry and prior appliance therapy were excluded.
Recruitment start date01/01/2003
Recruitment end date01/04/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Consultant Orthodontist
Preston
PR2 9HT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Department of Health (UK)
Government

Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/03/2012 Yes No