Touch-based treatments and infantile colic - Parental perceptions of treatment outcomes
ISRCTN | ISRCTN15640779 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15640779 |
Secondary identifying numbers | HUS-2351-2020-7, HEL 2020-012399 T 13 02 01 |
- Submission date
- 15/05/2025
- Registration date
- 19/05/2025
- Last edited
- 19/05/2025
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Infantile colic is a common condition affecting many newborns, characterized by excessive crying and discomfort, often without a clear cause. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different touch-based therapies—osteopathy, reflexology, and affective touch—in alleviating colic symptoms in infants.
Who can participate?
The study includes full-term infants aged 10 weeks or younger at the time of recruitment who exhibit symptoms consistent with colic, such as prolonged periods of crying. Parents or legal guardians must provide informed consent for their child's participation.
What does the study involve?
Participating infants were allocated to one of four groups—osteopathy, reflexology, affective touch, or standard care provided by child health clinic nurses—using a non-randomised assignment procedure.
Each intervention consists of multiple sessions over a period of 2–3 weeks. Parents are asked to maintain symptom diaries and complete questionnaires to report on their infant's crying patterns, sleep quality, and overall well-being. Additionally, some parents participate in semi-structured interviews to share their experiences with the assigned therapy.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Potential benefits include a reduction in colic symptoms, improved sleep patterns for the infant, and decreased parental stress. As the interventions are non-invasive and administered by trained professionals, risks are minimal. However, there may be a possibility that the therapy does not alleviate symptoms for all participants.
Where is the study run from?
The study recruitment is conducted in public child health clinics in Helsinki, the interventions are coordinated from the Metropolia University of Applied Sciences campus (Finland).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2020 to October 2022
Who is funding the study?
The study is funded by the Child and Nature Foundation and the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation (Finland)
Who is the main contact?
Tiina Väänänen, tiina.vaananen@tuni.fi
Contact information
Scientific, Principal Investigator
PL 4000
00079 Metropolia
Helsinki / Finland
Helsinki
00079
Finland
Phone | +358 (0)974245000 |
---|---|
leena.hannula@metropolia.fi |
Public
Pobox 4000
00079 Metropolia
Helsinki
00079
Finland
Phone | +358 (0)401591759 |
---|---|
sandra.rinne@metropolia.fi |
Scientific
Salastintie 66
Ruokolahti
56210
Finland
Phone | +358 (0)500764350 |
---|---|
tiina.vaananen@tuni.fi |
Study information
Study design | Single-centre mixed-methods interventional non-randomized single-blinded study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Non randomised study |
Study setting(s) | University/medical school/dental school |
Study type | Quality of life, Treatment, Efficacy |
Participant information sheet | 47352_PIS_Parents_14Oct20.pdf |
Scientific title | Touch-based treatments and infantile colic - Parental perceptions of treatment outcomes |
Study objectives | Our hypotheses were that: 1. Osteopathy and reflexology have a greater effect in reducing parent-reported infant crying hours and increasing the parent-reported infant sleeping hours than conventional care alone (H1a) 2. Affective touch has a greater effect in reducing these parent-reported colic symptoms than conventional care alone (H1b), osteopathy and reflexology are more effective than affective touch (H2) Our research questions were: 1. What effects do osteopathic treatment and reflexology have on infant colic symptoms, such as crying and sleep, as assessed by parents and practitioners, compared to affective touch or conventional child health clinic care only? 2. How do osteopathy and reflexology, in comparison to affective touch or conventional child health clinic care only, affect parental stress and fatigue, according to parents' self-reported experience? 3. How do parents perceive the benefits and usability of osteopathy and reflexology during and after the colic phase, in comparison to affective touch or conventional child health clinic care only? |
Ethics approval(s) |
1. Approved 28/10/2020, HUS ethical committee (HUS Tutkimuseettinen toimikunta PL 705, Helsinki, 000290, Finland; +358 (0)40 359 4618; eettinen.toimikunta@hus.fi), ref: HUS/2351/2020 2. Approved 08/01/2021, City of Helsinki (Pohjoisesplanadi 11-13, Helsinki, 00099, Finland; +358 (0)310 13700; tutkimusluvat.sote@hel.fi), ref: HEL 2020-012399 T 13 02 01 3. Approved 01/11/2021, City of Vantaa (Vantaan kaupungin kirjaamo, PL 1100, Vantaa, 01030, Finland; +358 (0)983911; kirjaamo@vantaa.fi), ref: VD/10228/13.00.00/2021 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Infantile colic |
Intervention | The study compared four intervention groups for infantile colic: (1) osteopathic treatment, (2) reflexology, (3) affective touch, and (4) child health clinic care only provided by child health clinic nurses. Each infant received one type of touch-based intervention, delivered by trained professionals or nurses over a series of sessions. Parents were instructed to observe and report outcomes such as crying, sleep, and overall well-being. All participating infants received three free-of-charge treatments over a 2- to 3-week period at the treatment centre of Metropolia University. Each appointment for osteopathy, reflexology, and affective touch lasted a full hour, including time for discussion and breaks. The manual procedure itself lasted approximately 20–30 minutes. Four follow-up questionnaires were sent to the osteopathy, reflexology and affective touch group parents: before the beginning of the experimental treatments (T0), within a day after the first treatment (T1), 1 week after the third treatment (T2) and 4 weeks after final treatment of the intervention (T3). Conventional care group parents were sent questionnaires T0, T2 and T3 at the same time points. The duration for treatment was 2-3 weeks and the follow-up lasted 4 weeks after the treatments, totalling a 7-week period. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Infant crying and sleeping patterns are measured using structured symptom diaries and questionnaires completed by parents at T0, T1, T2, and T3 for intervention groups and at T0, T2, and T3 for the conventional care group 2. Parental stress levels are measured using validated self-report questionnaires at T0, T1, T2, and T3 for intervention groups and at T0, T2, and T3 for the conventional care group 3. Parental fatigue levels are measured using validated self-report questionnaires at T0, T1, T2, and T3 for intervention groups and at T0, T2, and T3 for the conventional care group 4. Infant sleep duration and quality are measured using structured sleep diaries and questionnaires completed by parents at T0, T1, T2, and T3 for intervention groups and at T0, T2, and T3 for the conventional care group 5. Parental perceptions of the benefits and usability of the assigned intervention are measured using post-intervention surveys at T3 for all groups |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Infant crying time is measured using parent-reported structured diaries in hours per day at T0, T2, and T3 2. Infant sleeping time is measured using parent-reported structured diaries in hours per day at T0, T2, and T3 3. Parent-perceived effectiveness of the intervention in reducing infant crying and improving sleep quality is measured using parent self-assessment questionnaires at T2 and T3 4. Parental post-natal stress is measured using the Postnatal Stress Questionnaire (Park et al. 2015) at T0, T2, and T3 5. Parenting-related stress is measured using the Parenting Stress Index Short Form (Berry and Jones 1995) at T0, T2, and T3 6. Perceived general stress is measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1983) at T0, T2, and T3 7. Infant colic symptoms are measured using parent-reported symptom diaries and questionnaires covering the preceding 24 hours and preceding week at T0, T2, and T3 8. Parental experiences of therapeutic touch are measured using semi-structured interviews analyzed with thematic analysis at T3 |
Overall study start date | 01/01/2020 |
Completion date | 31/10/2022 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Child |
Upper age limit | 10 Weeks |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 200 |
Total final enrolment | 177 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Full-term infants (gestational age ≥37 weeks) 2. Aged 10 weeks or younger at the time of recruitment 3. Presence of infantile colic symptoms, defined as crying for more than 3 hours per day, at least 3 days per week, consistent with Wessel's criteria. 4. Written informed consent obtained from parent(s) or legal guardian(s) |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Preterm infants (gestational age <37 weeks) 2. Infants with additional medical diagnoses |
Date of first enrolment | 15/02/2021 |
Date of final enrolment | 30/10/2022 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Finland
Study participating centre
Helsinki
00920
Finland
Sponsor information
University/education
Po Box 4000
00079 Metropolia Campus
Helsinki
00079
Finland
Phone | +358 (0)74245000 |
---|---|
sandra.rinne@metropolia.fi | |
Website | https://www.metropolia.fi |
https://ror.org/03hdaef25 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
No information available
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 30/11/2025 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Stored in non-publicly available repository |
Publication and dissemination plan | The findings from this study have been published in the Finnish nursing science journal Hoitotiede (Vol 36, No 2, 2024). The article, titled "Vauvan koliikki koskettaa – koliikkivauvaperheiden kokemuksia saamastaan tuesta ja kosketushoidoista," explores parents' experiences of support and touch therapies for infants with colic. The publication provides valuable insights into how parents perceive the effectiveness of interventions such as osteopathy, reflexology, and affective touch in alleviating colic symptoms. In addition to this publication we are preparing publications to international scientific journals. Also we plan to, we plan to disseminate the study results through presentations at national and international conferences focusing on pediatric health and complementary therapies. A plain-language summary of the findings will be prepared and shared through the study's website and social media platforms to reach a broader audience, including parents and caregivers. Furthermore, we intend to collaborate with local child health clinics to distribute informational materials summarizing the study outcomes. In line with open science practices, anonymized individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request, following the completion of the study and publication of the primary results. Requests for data access will be reviewed by the study's principal investigator to ensure compliance with ethical standards and data protection regulations. |
IPD sharing plan | The research data of the project will be retained by stored on Metropolia University's secure online disk for as long as necessary for the analysis and reporting of the research data and for five years after the end of the study until 2028. Manual data (consent forms and symptom diaries) will be disposed of appropriately in the shredder of the data protection container. After the study has been completed, when identifying information has been removed from the literature and the survey data has been anonymized, the data can be handed over for storage, for example, to the tietoarkisto.fi (Data Archive) https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/. Data type: De-identified individual participant data (IPD), including parent-reported symptom diaries, questionnaire responses, and relevant demographic information. Availability: Data will be accessible starting six months after the publication of the final study results and will remain available for a period of five years. Access criteria: Researchers interested in accessing the data must submit a formal request to the principal investigator, including a brief proposal outlining the intended use of the data. Mechanism: Upon approval of the request, a data sharing agreement will be established to ensure compliance with ethical standards and data protection regulations. Consent and anonymization: Participants' legal guardians provided informed consent for the use of de-identified data in future research. All shared data will be anonymized to protect participant confidentiality. Ethical considerations: Data sharing will adhere to applicable ethical guidelines and legal requirements, ensuring that the rights and privacy of participants are safeguarded. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participant information sheet | version 3 | 14/10/2020 | 19/05/2025 | No | Yes |
Participant information sheet | 18/09/2020 | 19/05/2025 | No | Yes | |
Participant information sheet | 18/09/2020 | 19/05/2025 | No | Yes | |
Protocol file | version 3 | 15/10/2020 | 19/05/2025 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
16/05/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by HUS ethical committee.